- To
help us discover it, we'll turn to Descartes
himself. He elaborated: "By the
word 'thought' I understand all that of which we
are conscious as operating in us." Here,
thought/thinking is equated with being conscious
of all which is operating in
us. In other words, the process of thinking is
supposed to cover all areas
of our being - even: our deep longings, our
subtle intuitions, our sublime dreams. Are these
in the province of "thought"? Upon some
reflection, every human being will say: "NO,
one thousand times no!" So, the statement "I
think, therefore I am" is
incorrect.
-
- Thinking
does NOT cover the most essential activities of
our being. There is something else at work within
us; something, which operates on a much deeper
level than mere brain-activity. This
"something" is our spirit.
It is only the activity of the spirit, which
truly encompasses all areas
of our being. So, the correct statement would
then be:"I am spiritual, therefore
I am". But, for some reason, this
sounds strange to us. We seem to be unable to
derive the same kind of re-affirmation of our
existence from this statement as we did from the
original statement ("I think,
therefore I am"). This in itself
shows us how we have failed to become
truly spiritual beings. We have failed
to develop and to realize the potential of the
spirit within us. Worse than this, we have failed
to even learn how to distinguish between our
brain activity and our spiritual activity. The
expressions "intellectual life" and
"spiritual life" are used
interchangeably most of the time, without the
slightest sensing that, in reality, they stand in
opposition to each other. We are simply cut off
from our spirit, eventhough we carry it within
us.